Vim control lines were re-introduced or not entirely cleaned up.
This nukes them again.
Removing from embedding, extensions, gfx, hal, ipc, layout, mailnews,
media and memory. More to come.
It turns out part 10 was actually needed, but Bug 1449838 had a significantly
better version of what that code does that was easy enough to backport to what
we have. As far as I can tell, this passes the relevant reftests now.
My previous fix apparently only worked with GCC 7. Having that return at the
end doesn't seem to hurt anything on Windows, so I see no reason to ifdef it.
I don't remember where I heard this, but I vaguely remember hearing that
ending a function without a return statement may be undefined behavior that
differs between compilers and operating systems. If so, that would explain why
this has behaved so differently across platforms and compilers.
The issue is that select elements may contain some non-Latin characters that
need extra block-size to display than the one line-height calculated by using a
Latin font spec in the style.
Before this patch, when a control has an unconstrained block-size, we set
the element's block-size to one line-height in Reflow(), which is intended to
properly initialize `BlockReflowInput::mMinLineHeight` since it uses
`line-height:-moz-block-height`.
However, this simply prevents the display from choosing a larger block-size
after the reflow occurs. Previously, this discrepancy was absorbed by the extra
padding present to make select elements the same intrinsic size as buttons, but
since we did away with that, we're losing the extra space and the font glyphs
get clipped.
This patch fixes the issue by carrying the computed line height over to the
element's display so that its computed block-size is still unconstrained.
This way it can accommodate taller characters in the display text.
After this patch, a <select><option> containing non-Latin characters should have
the same block-size as <button>, and no characters should be clipped.
To better distinguish the calculation of line height (still present with args)
and simply getting the line height without args, it's now called GetLineHeight()
This also introduces `mLineHeight` to cache specifically calculated line heights
that aren't "auto" (which is a magic value), and it opens up the possibility to
override it in Part 7.
This allows us to use a greater rendering depth for exceedingly-deep DOM trees
in layout, better matching what mainstream browsers are capable of. Note that
for 32-bit Windows the stack size MUST be set to larger than the default or Bad
Things Will Happen™ - we use 1.5 MB for this as a carefully-tuned value.
This needs to be capped specifically for JS use because some JavaScript
obfuscators deliberately trigger stack overflows and would lock up the browser
otherwise as long as there's still stack space to abuse. For web compatibility
we therefore limit this to 2MB in JS only (3x for ASAN) while still allowing
a greater depth for the layout engine.
This removes the need to keep the `flex-basis` handling code of the ComputeSize* functions in sync since they both call the same function now for this purpose.
This implements flexbox layout for the gap properties without the refactoring work performed on `nsFlexContainerFrame`.
Partially based on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1398483 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1454822
This excludes the second part of bug 1454822, the width caching implementation, because it is out of scope and currently causes unstable layout with `writing-mode: vertical-lr` (see bug 1709937).
This removes the `grid` prefix from the gap-related properties of grid since they are now part of the box alignment specification. Former grid-gap* properties were aliased to the unprefixed properties to maintain compatibility.
The previously multi-column layout only `column-gap` property has been modified to apply to the Grid layout (and Flexbox in a following commit), moving the `mColumnGap` member variable from `nsStyleColumn` to `nsStylePosition`.
Notes:
* Bug 1398537 - support for percent values in column-gap for multi-column layout landed as part of Issue #1230. However, it was incomplete because it did not update `nsRuleNode` to allow transformation of percentage values for `column-gap`. This was consequently fixed as part of this commit.
* Bug 1456166 - this might not apply because we don't have that devtools test in UXP
* `nsRuleNode`, `nsCSSParser`, `Declaration`, and other related classes were merged into Stylo. These should be taken into consideration when porting patches from Mozilla.
Partially based on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1398482
The removal of this preference was botched, all other surrounding plumbing changes appear to be working okay. The ability to use prefs to control this stylesheet might be useful in the future, so perhaps this is one of those "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" bugs where leaving well enough alone in the first place would have been the best choice.
ScrollbarStyles contains values of overflow, (over)scroll-behavior, etc.
The only one which is marginally related to scroll _bars_ is overflow, which can
be used to hide scrollbar (by making an element not scrollable) or enforce the
scrollbar to display.
It makes more sense to be called ScrollStyles as it's mainly concerning behavior
of scrolling, not scrollbars. Also, with the addition of scrollbar width
properties, the current name can be confusing.
Overflow properties have two purposes:
1. controlling whether the scrollbar should be shown;
2. controlling whether the content is scrollable.
However, with the scrollbar-width property being added, scrollability and
presence of a scrollbar are no longer tied together.
This patch makes a separation between the value of overflow and the presence of
a scrollbar by making it clear that for ScrollReflowInput, we only care about
whether scrollbar should be shown.
This should make it easier to write the logic involving presence of the
scrollbar based on webdev choice.
Currently -moz-tab-size only accepts <number> values, and both Chrome and Firefox currently support <length> values and have for some time now. So with this you would be able to support sizes in px or em, for instance. This was implemented in Firefox 53 and was trivial to backport.
Mozilla's original implementation of this failed a couple of tests, but this seems to solve all the problems. Basically, the caret-color wasn't able to be set differently based on whether a link was visited, and the auto value implementation was incomplete. The only test we fail now is the one where you have grey text on a grey background and the caret is supposed to be visible, but I think that may have been removed from the spec. Even if it wasn't, no other browser supports it anyway.
This CSS property allows input carets (that blinking input cursor you see in text fields), to be given a custom color. This was implemented in Firefox 53, and it was such a minor feature that no one ever missed it, but I don't see any harm in implementing this.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1063162
This actually keeps both pseudo-elements for now, since the prefixed version is
still used internally, but we need the unprefixed version for web compat.
Note: while unprefixing a non-spec-compliant pseudo here, it's exactly in line
with what other browsers do. Nobody is following the spec here and at least
we'll be doing what everyone else is with our unprefixed version.