Note: non-inherited properties are stored in "reset" style structs.
Previous implementation treats it as an inherited property, which
doesn't match the spec.
This also fixes the incorrect behavior when using the `unset` value
for this property by specifying SETVAL_UNSET_INITIAL in the mask.
Note: Because the new function checks types, we need to change the
fullCorner type in `nsComputedDOMStyle::GetEllipseRadii()` and
`StyleAnimationValue::ExtractComputedValue()` to `Corner` instead of the
underlying base type.
This removes the `grid` prefix from the gap-related properties of grid since they are now part of the box alignment specification. Former grid-gap* properties were aliased to the unprefixed properties to maintain compatibility.
The previously multi-column layout only `column-gap` property has been modified to apply to the Grid layout (and Flexbox in a following commit), moving the `mColumnGap` member variable from `nsStyleColumn` to `nsStylePosition`.
Notes:
* Bug 1398537 - support for percent values in column-gap for multi-column layout landed as part of Issue #1230. However, it was incomplete because it did not update `nsRuleNode` to allow transformation of percentage values for `column-gap`. This was consequently fixed as part of this commit.
* Bug 1456166 - this might not apply because we don't have that devtools test in UXP
* `nsRuleNode`, `nsCSSParser`, `Declaration`, and other related classes were merged into Stylo. These should be taken into consideration when porting patches from Mozilla.
Partially based on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1398482
ScrollbarStyles contains values of overflow, (over)scroll-behavior, etc.
The only one which is marginally related to scroll _bars_ is overflow, which can
be used to hide scrollbar (by making an element not scrollable) or enforce the
scrollbar to display.
It makes more sense to be called ScrollStyles as it's mainly concerning behavior
of scrolling, not scrollbars. Also, with the addition of scrollbar width
properties, the current name can be confusing.
While we do fail a couple of tests, the other mainstream browsers also fail them and I think our implementation of tab-size is good enough to be unprefixed at this point. Having this patch also makes testing easier.
Currently -moz-tab-size only accepts <number> values, and both Chrome and Firefox currently support <length> values and have for some time now. So with this you would be able to support sizes in px or em, for instance. This was implemented in Firefox 53 and was trivial to backport.
Mozilla's original implementation of this failed a couple of tests, but this seems to solve all the problems. Basically, the caret-color wasn't able to be set differently based on whether a link was visited, and the auto value implementation was incomplete. The only test we fail now is the one where you have grey text on a grey background and the caret is supposed to be visible, but I think that may have been removed from the spec. Even if it wasn't, no other browser supports it anyway.
This CSS property allows input carets (that blinking input cursor you see in text fields), to be given a custom color. This was implemented in Firefox 53, and it was such a minor feature that no one ever missed it, but I don't see any harm in implementing this.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1063162
Even though percentages are already treated as floats internally by the style system for computation purposes, you have to go out of your way to stop them from being read back out as percentages. What I do here amounts to storing the percentage token in the "wrong" container, the one normally used for floats. This allows a value that was read in as a percentage to be read back out as something else, which is normally prevented by the design of the style system.
This preliminary step allows percentages to be computed and display correctly,
but unfortunately it fails a test after changing VARIANT_HN to VARIANT_HPN because that allows values to be serialized as percentages. However, not doing this means percentages are rejected as valid values for the user to input. The way the style system is setup makes it hard to change this for opacity without changing it for everything else, especially since some code-saving speed hacks in Bug 636029 and Bug 441367 that make a lot of assumptions about this stuff very rigid.
This is just a clean port of 1322191 and follow-up 1325970. It really seems to add create a new way to access existing code relating to block formatting and floating elements rather than implementing new functionality, and it is mercifully straightforwards.
