wuggy/Dactyloidae
wuggy/Dactyloidae
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://repo.dactyloidae.xyz/Dactyloidae/UXP.git synced 2026-10-20 06:07:30 +09:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

MoonchildProductions#1251 - Part 5: Fix POSIX compliance issue in process_util.h.

Browse source 
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1364865

Solaris doesn't define NAME_MAX because if you read the current POSIX standard literally, no system that supports multiple file systems or networking should be defining it. It's a pedantic choice given that they USED to define NAME_MAX, but Solaris always did take POSIX compliance seriously, for better or worse.
This commit is contained in:
athenian200 2019-10-01 19:15:26 -05:00 • committed by Roy Tam
commit bfb6af4f3a
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util.h
View file

@ -44,10 +44,12 @@ typedef PROCESSENTRY32 ProcessEntry;
typedef IO_COUNTERS IoCounters; typedef IO_COUNTERS IoCounters;
#elif defined(OS_POSIX) #elif defined(OS_POSIX)
// TODO(port): we should not rely on a Win32 structure. // TODO(port): we should not rely on a Win32 structure.
// Using NAME_MAX here would raise POSIX compliance issues
// (see Mozilla bug 1364865).
struct ProcessEntry { struct ProcessEntry {
int pid; int pid;
int ppid; int ppid;
char szExeFile[NAME_MAX + 1]; char szExeFile[_POSIX_PATH_MAX + 1];
}; };
struct IoCounters { struct IoCounters {