diff --git a/dom/html/nsGenericHTMLElement.cpp b/dom/html/nsGenericHTMLElement.cpp index 5af578b2d5..35ce8533bf 100644 --- a/dom/html/nsGenericHTMLElement.cpp +++ b/dom/html/nsGenericHTMLElement.cpp @@ -1480,7 +1480,7 @@ nsGenericHTMLElement::MapImageSizeAttributesInto(const nsMappedAttributes* aAttr } } - if (Preferences::GetBool("layout.css.width-and-height-map-to-aspect-ratio.enabled") && + if (Preferences::GetBool("layout.css.intrinsic-aspect-ratio.enabled") && aMapAspectRatio && aWidth && aHeight) { Maybe w; if (aWidth->Type() == nsAttrValue::eInteger) { diff --git a/modules/libpref/init/all.js b/modules/libpref/init/all.js index 89da97f39f..75174b1f8c 100644 --- a/modules/libpref/init/all.js +++ b/modules/libpref/init/all.js @@ -4824,7 +4824,7 @@ pref("layout.css.touch_action.enabled", true); // https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html#attributes-for-embedded-content-and-images // Are the width and height attributes on image-like elements mapped to the // internal-for-now aspect-ratio property? -pref("layout.css.width-and-height-map-to-aspect-ratio.enabled", false); +pref("layout.css.intrinsic-aspect-ratio.enabled", true); // Enables some assertions in nsStyleContext that are too expensive // for general use, but might be useful to enable for specific tests.