Revert "Issue #1986 - Use logical coordinates in flex containers."

This reverts commit 7527371d78.
This commit is contained in:
roytam1 2022-09-29 15:18:18 +08:00
commit 52a48df032
4 changed files with 115 additions and 147 deletions

View file

@ -511,15 +511,6 @@ public:
// visibility:collapse.
bool IsStrut() const { return mIsStrut; }
// Returns true if this item's inline axis is parallel (or antiparallel)
// to the container's main axis. Otherwise (i.e. if this item's inline axis
// is orthogonal to the container's main axis), this function returns false.
bool IsInlineAxisMainAxis() const { return mIsInlineAxisMainAxis; }
// Same as above, but for cross axis. Equivalent to !IsInlineAxisMainAxis().
// This just exists for convenience/readability at callsites.
bool IsInlineAxisCrossAxis() const { return !mIsInlineAxisMainAxis; }
WritingMode GetWritingMode() const { return mWM; }
uint8_t GetAlignSelf() const { return mAlignSelf; }
@ -758,8 +749,10 @@ protected:
void CheckForMinSizeAuto(const ReflowInput& aFlexItemReflowInput,
const FlexboxAxisTracker& aAxisTracker);
// Values that we already know in constructor (and are hence mostly 'const'):
nsIFrame* const mFrame; // The flex item's frame.
// Our frame:
nsIFrame* const mFrame;
// Values that we already know in constructor: (and are hence mostly 'const')
const float mFlexGrow;
const float mFlexShrink;
@ -792,7 +785,6 @@ protected:
// until after main-size has been resolved. In particular, these could share
// memory with mMainPosn through mAscent, and mIsStretched.
float mShareOfWeightSoFar;
const WritingMode mWM; // The flex item's writing mode.
bool mIsFrozen;
bool mHadMinViolation;
bool mHadMaxViolation;
@ -803,11 +795,11 @@ protected:
bool mIsStretched; // See IsStretched() documentation
bool mIsStrut; // Is this item a "strut" left behind by an element
// with visibility:collapse?
const bool mIsInlineAxisMainAxis; // See IsInlineAxisMainAxis() documentation
// Does this item need to resolve a min-[width|height]:auto (in main-axis).
bool mNeedsMinSizeAutoResolution;
const WritingMode mWM; // The flex item's writing mode.
uint8_t mAlignSelf; // My "align-self" computed value (with "auto"
// swapped out for parent"s "align-items" value,
// in our constructor).
@ -1500,26 +1492,21 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::GenerateFlexItemForChild(
// Static helper-functions for ResolveAutoFlexBasisAndMinSize():
// -------------------------------------------------------------
// Indicates whether the cross-size property is set to something definite,
// for the purpose of intrinsic ratio calculations.
// The logic here should be similar to the logic for isAutoISize/isAutoBSize
// Indicates whether the cross-size property is set to something definite.
// The logic here should be similar to the logic for isAutoWidth/isAutoHeight
// in nsFrame::ComputeSizeWithIntrinsicDimensions().
static bool
IsCrossSizeDefinite(const ReflowInput& aItemReflowInput,
const FlexboxAxisTracker& aAxisTracker)
{
const nsStylePosition* pos = aItemReflowInput.mStylePosition;
const WritingMode containerWM = aAxisTracker.GetWritingMode();
if (aAxisTracker.IsColumnOriented()) {
// Column-oriented means cross axis is container's inline axis.
return pos->ISize(containerWM).GetUnit() != eStyleUnit_Auto;
if (aAxisTracker.IsCrossAxisHorizontal()) {
return pos->mWidth.GetUnit() != eStyleUnit_Auto;
}
// Else, we're row-oriented, which means cross axis is container's block
// axis. We need to use IsAutoBSize() to catch e.g. %-BSize applied to
// indefinite container BSize, which counts as auto.
nscoord cbBSize = aItemReflowInput.mCBReflowInput->ComputedBSize();
return !nsLayoutUtils::IsAutoBSize(pos->BSize(containerWM), cbBSize);
// else, vertical. (We need to use IsAutoHeight() to catch e.g. %-height
// applied to indefinite-height containing block, which counts as auto.)
nscoord cbHeight = aItemReflowInput.mCBReflowInput->ComputedHeight();
return !nsLayoutUtils::IsAutoHeight(pos->mHeight, cbHeight);
}
// If aFlexItem has a definite cross size, this function returns it, for usage
@ -1689,10 +1676,9 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::
const ReflowInput& aItemReflowInput,
const FlexboxAxisTracker& aAxisTracker)
{
// (Note: We can guarantee that the flex-basis will have already been
// resolved if the main axis is the same is the same as the item's inline
// axis. Inline-axis values should always be resolvable without reflow.)
const bool isMainSizeAuto = (!aFlexItem.IsInlineAxisMainAxis() &&
// (Note: We should never have a used flex-basis of "auto" if our main axis
// is horizontal; width values should always be resolvable without reflow.)
const bool isMainSizeAuto = (!aAxisTracker.IsMainAxisHorizontal() &&
NS_AUTOHEIGHT == aFlexItem.GetFlexBaseSize());
const bool isMainMinSizeAuto = aFlexItem.NeedsMinSizeAutoResolution();
@ -1723,14 +1709,10 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::
flexContainerRI->ComputedISize(),
flexContainerRI->ComputedBSize());
// Is container's cross size "definite"?
// - If it's column-oriented, then "yes", because its cross size is its
// inline-size which is always definite from its descendants' perspective.
// - Otherwise (if it's row-oriented), then we check the actual size
// and call it definite if it's not NS_AUTOHEIGHT.
if (aAxisTracker.IsColumnOriented() ||
// (Container's cross size is definite if cross-axis is horizontal, or if
// cross-axis is vertical and the cross-size is not NS_AUTOHEIGHT.)
if (aAxisTracker.IsCrossAxisHorizontal() ||
containerCrossSize != NS_AUTOHEIGHT) {
// Container's cross size is "definite", so we can resolve the item's
// stretched cross size using that.
aFlexItem.ResolveStretchedCrossSize(containerCrossSize, aAxisTracker);
}
}
@ -1762,7 +1744,7 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::
// Measure content, if needed (w/ intrinsic-width method or a reflow)
if (minSizeNeedsToMeasureContent || flexBasisNeedsToMeasureContent) {
if (aFlexItem.IsInlineAxisMainAxis()) {
if (aAxisTracker.IsMainAxisHorizontal()) {
if (minSizeNeedsToMeasureContent) {
nscoord frameMinISize =
aFlexItem.Frame()->GetMinISize(aItemReflowInput.mRenderingContext);
@ -1773,32 +1755,30 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::
"reflow state, for horizontal flexbox. It shouldn't need "
"special handling here");
} else {
// If this item is flexible (in its block axis)...
// OR if we're measuring its 'auto' min-BSize, with its main-size (in its
// block axis) being something non-"auto"...
// THEN: we assume that the computed BSize that we're reflowing with now
// could be different from the one we'll use for this flex item's
// "actual" reflow later on. In that case, we need to be sure the flex
// item treats this as a block-axis resize (regardless of whether there
// are actually any ancestors being resized in that axis).
// (Note: We don't have to do this for the inline axis, because
// InitResizeFlags will always turn on mIsIResize on when it sees that
// the computed ISize is different from current ISize, and that's all we
// need.)
bool forceBResizeForMeasuringReflow =
// If this item is flexible (vertically), or if we're measuring the
// 'auto' min-height and our main-size is something else, then we assume
// that the computed-height we're reflowing with now could be different
// from the one we'll use for this flex item's "actual" reflow later on.
// In that case, we need to be sure the flex item treats this as a
// vertical resize, even though none of its ancestors are necessarily
// being vertically resized.
// (Note: We don't have to do this for width, because InitResizeFlags
// will always turn on mHResize on when it sees that the computed width
// is different from current width, and that's all we need.)
bool forceVerticalResizeForMeasuringReflow =
!aFlexItem.IsFrozen() || // Is the item flexible?
!flexBasisNeedsToMeasureContent; // Are we *only* measuring it for
// 'min-block-size:auto'?
// 'min-height:auto'?
nscoord contentBSize =
MeasureFlexItemContentBSize(aPresContext, aFlexItem,
forceBResizeForMeasuringReflow,
*flexContainerRI);
nscoord contentHeight =
MeasureFlexItemContentHeight(aPresContext, aFlexItem,
forceVerticalResizeForMeasuringReflow,
*flexContainerRI);
if (minSizeNeedsToMeasureContent) {
resolvedMinSize = std::min(resolvedMinSize, contentBSize);
resolvedMinSize = std::min(resolvedMinSize, contentHeight);
}
if (flexBasisNeedsToMeasureContent) {
aFlexItem.SetFlexBaseSizeAndMainSize(contentBSize);
aFlexItem.SetFlexBaseSizeAndMainSize(contentHeight);
}
}
}
@ -1820,7 +1800,7 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::
* intrinsic size is marked as dirty (due to a style or DOM change).
*
* In particular the computed height may change between measuring reflows due to
* how the mIsFlexContainerMeasuringBSize flag affects size computation (see
* how the mIsFlexContainerMeasuringReflow flag affects size computation (see
* bug 1336708).
*
* Caching it prevents us from doing exponential reflows in cases of deeply
@ -1832,27 +1812,27 @@ class nsFlexContainerFrame::CachedMeasuringReflowResult
{
// Members that are part of the cache key:
const LogicalSize mAvailableSize;
const nscoord mComputedBSize;
const nscoord mComputedHeight;
// Members that are part of the cache value:
const nscoord mBSize;
const nscoord mHeight;
const nscoord mAscent;
public:
CachedMeasuringReflowResult(const ReflowInput& aReflowInput,
const ReflowOutput& aDesiredSize)
: mAvailableSize(aReflowInput.AvailableSize())
, mComputedBSize(aReflowInput.ComputedBSize())
, mBSize(aDesiredSize.BSize(aReflowInput.GetWritingMode()))
, mComputedHeight(aReflowInput.ComputedHeight())
, mHeight(aDesiredSize.Height())
, mAscent(aDesiredSize.BlockStartAscent())
{}
bool IsValidFor(const ReflowInput& aReflowInput) const {
return mAvailableSize == aReflowInput.AvailableSize() &&
mComputedBSize == aReflowInput.ComputedBSize();
mComputedHeight == aReflowInput.ComputedHeight();
}
nscoord BSize() const { return mBSize; }
nscoord Height() const { return mHeight; }
nscoord Ascent() const { return mAscent; }
};
@ -1861,7 +1841,7 @@ NS_DECLARE_FRAME_PROPERTY_DELETABLE(CachedFlexMeasuringReflow,
CachedMeasuringReflowResult);
const CachedMeasuringReflowResult&
nsFlexContainerFrame::MeasureAscentAndBSizeForFlexItem(
nsFlexContainerFrame::MeasureAscentAndHeightForFlexItem(
FlexItem& aItem,
nsPresContext* aPresContext,
ReflowInput& aChildReflowInput)
@ -1912,44 +1892,43 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::MarkIntrinsicISizesDirty()
nscoord
nsFlexContainerFrame::
MeasureFlexItemContentBSize(nsPresContext* aPresContext,
FlexItem& aFlexItem,
bool aForceBResizeForMeasuringReflow,
const ReflowInput& aParentReflowInput)
MeasureFlexItemContentHeight(nsPresContext* aPresContext,
FlexItem& aFlexItem,
bool aForceVerticalResizeForMeasuringReflow,
const ReflowInput& aParentReflowInput)
{
// Set up a reflow state for measuring the flex item's auto-height:
WritingMode wm = aFlexItem.Frame()->GetWritingMode();
LogicalSize availSize = aParentReflowInput.ComputedSize(wm);
availSize.BSize(wm) = NS_UNCONSTRAINEDSIZE;
ReflowInput
childRIForMeasuringBSize(aPresContext, aParentReflowInput,
aFlexItem.Frame(), availSize,
nullptr, ReflowInput::CALLER_WILL_INIT);
childRIForMeasuringBSize.mFlags.mIsFlexContainerMeasuringBSize = true;
childRIForMeasuringBSize.Init(aPresContext);
childRIForMeasuringHeight(aPresContext, aParentReflowInput,
aFlexItem.Frame(), availSize,
nullptr, ReflowInput::CALLER_WILL_INIT);
childRIForMeasuringHeight.mFlags.mIsFlexContainerMeasuringHeight = true;
childRIForMeasuringHeight.Init(aPresContext);
if (aFlexItem.IsStretched()) {
childRIForMeasuringBSize.SetComputedISize(aFlexItem.GetCrossSize());
childRIForMeasuringBSize.SetIResize(true);
childRIForMeasuringHeight.SetComputedWidth(aFlexItem.GetCrossSize());
childRIForMeasuringHeight.SetHResize(true);
}
if (aForceBResizeForMeasuringReflow) {
childRIForMeasuringBSize.SetBResize(true);
if (aForceVerticalResizeForMeasuringReflow) {
childRIForMeasuringHeight.SetVResize(true);
}
const CachedMeasuringReflowResult& reflowResult =
MeasureAscentAndBSizeForFlexItem(aFlexItem, aPresContext,
childRIForMeasuringBSize);
MeasureAscentAndHeightForFlexItem(aFlexItem, aPresContext,
childRIForMeasuringHeight);
aFlexItem.SetAscent(reflowResult.Ascent());
// Subtract border/padding in vertical axis, to get _just_
// the effective computed value of the "height" property.
nscoord childDesiredHeight = reflowResult.Height() -
childRIForMeasuringHeight.ComputedPhysicalBorderPadding().TopBottom();
// Subtract border/padding in block axis, to get _just_
// the effective computed value of the BSize property.
nscoord childDesiredBSize = reflowResult.BSize() -
childRIForMeasuringBSize.ComputedLogicalBorderPadding().BStartEnd(wm);
return std::max(0, childDesiredBSize);
return std::max(0, childDesiredHeight);
}
FlexItem::FlexItem(ReflowInput& aFlexItemReflowInput,
@ -1973,16 +1952,14 @@ FlexItem::FlexItem(ReflowInput& aFlexItemReflowInput,
mCrossPosn(0),
mAscent(0),
mShareOfWeightSoFar(0.0f),
mWM(aFlexItemReflowInput.GetWritingMode()),
mIsFrozen(false),
mHadMinViolation(false),
mHadMaxViolation(false),
mHadMeasuringReflow(false),
mIsStretched(false),
mIsStrut(false),
mIsInlineAxisMainAxis(aAxisTracker.IsRowOriented() !=
aAxisTracker.GetWritingMode().IsOrthogonalTo(mWM))
// mNeedsMinSizeAutoResolution is initialized in CheckForMinSizeAuto()
mWM(aFlexItemReflowInput.GetWritingMode())
// mAlignSelf, see below
{
MOZ_ASSERT(mFrame, "expecting a non-null child frame");
@ -2070,17 +2047,14 @@ FlexItem::FlexItem(nsIFrame* aChildFrame, nscoord aCrossSize,
mCrossPosn(0),
mAscent(0),
mShareOfWeightSoFar(0.0f),
// Struts don't do layout, so its WM doesn't matter at this point. So, we
// just share container's WM for simplicity:
mWM(aContainerWM),
mIsFrozen(true),
mHadMinViolation(false),
mHadMaxViolation(false),
mHadMeasuringReflow(false),
mIsStretched(false),
mIsStrut(true), // (this is the constructor for making struts, after all)
mIsInlineAxisMainAxis(true), // (doesn't matter b/c we're not doing layout)
mNeedsMinSizeAutoResolution(false),
mWM(aContainerWM),
mAlignSelf(NS_STYLE_ALIGN_FLEX_START)
{
MOZ_ASSERT(mFrame, "expecting a non-null child frame");
@ -2197,28 +2171,15 @@ FlexItem::CanMainSizeInfluenceCrossSize(
return true;
}
if (IsInlineAxisCrossAxis()) {
// If we get here, this function is really asking: "can changes to this
// item's block size have an influence on its inline size"? For blocks and
// tables, the answer is "no".
if (mFrame->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::blockFrame ||
mFrame->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::tableWrapperFrame) {
// XXXdholbert (Maybe use an IsFrameOfType query or something more
// general to test this across all frame types? For now, I'm just
// optimizing for block and table, since those are common containers that
// can contain arbitrarily-large subtrees (and that reliably have ISize
// being unaffected by BSize, per CSS2). So optimizing away needless
// relayout is possible & especially valuable for these containers.)
return false;
}
// Other opt-outs can go here, as they're identified as being useful
// (particularly for containers where an extra reflow is expensive). But in
// general, we have to assume that a flexed BSize *could* influence the
// ISize. Some examples where this can definitely happen:
// * Intrinsically-sized multicol with fixed-ISize columns, which adds
// columns (i.e. grows in inline axis) depending on its block size.
// * Intrinsically-sized multi-line column-oriented flex container, which
// adds flex lines (i.e. grows in inline axis) depending on its block size.
if (aAxisTracker.IsCrossAxisHorizontal()) {
// If the cross axis is horizontal, then changes to the item's main size
// (height) can't influence its cross size (width), if the item is a block
// with a horizontal writing-mode.
// XXXdholbert This doesn't account for vertical writing-modes, items with
// aspect ratios, items that are multicol elements, & items that are
// multi-line vertical flex containers. In all of those cases, a change to
// the height could influence the width.
return false;
}
// Default assumption, if we haven't proven otherwise: the resolved main size
@ -4122,10 +4083,19 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::SizeItemInCrossAxis(
ReflowInput& aChildReflowInput,
FlexItem& aItem)
{
// If cross axis is the item's inline axis, just use ISize from reflow state,
// and don't bother with a full reflow.
if (aItem.IsInlineAxisCrossAxis()) {
aItem.SetCrossSize(aChildReflowInput.ComputedISize());
if (aAxisTracker.IsCrossAxisHorizontal()) {
MOZ_ASSERT(aItem.HasIntrinsicRatio(),
"For now, caller's CanMainSizeInfluenceCrossSize check should "
"only allow us to get here for items with intrinsic ratio");
// XXXdholbert When we finish support for vertical writing-modes,
// (in bug 1079155 or a dependency), we'll relax the horizontal check in
// CanMainSizeInfluenceCrossSize, and this function will need to be able
// to measure the baseline & width (given our resolved height)
// of vertical-writing-mode flex items here.
// For now, we only expect to get here for items with an intrinsic aspect
// ratio; and for those items, we can just read the size off of the reflow
// state, without performing reflow.
aItem.SetCrossSize(aChildReflowInput.ComputedWidth());
return;
}
@ -4134,18 +4104,16 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::SizeItemInCrossAxis(
if (aItem.GetAlignSelf() == NS_STYLE_ALIGN_STRETCH) {
// This item's got "align-self: stretch", so we probably imposed a
// stretched computed cross-size on it during its previous
// reflow. We're not imposing that BSize for *this* "measuring" reflow, so
// we need to tell it to treat this reflow as a resize in its block axis
// (regardless of whether any of its ancestors are actually being resized).
// (Note: we know that the cross axis is the item's *block* axis -- if it
// weren't, then we would've taken the early-return above.)
aChildReflowInput.SetBResize(true);
// stretched computed height on it during its previous reflow. We're
// not imposing that height for *this* measuring reflow, so we need to
// tell it to treat this reflow as a vertical resize (regardless of
// whether any of its ancestors are being resized).
aChildReflowInput.SetVResize(true);
}
// Potentially reflow the item, and get the sizing info.
const CachedMeasuringReflowResult& reflowResult =
MeasureAscentAndBSizeForFlexItem(aItem, aPresContext, aChildReflowInput);
MeasureAscentAndHeightForFlexItem(aItem, aPresContext, aChildReflowInput);
// Save the sizing info that we learned from this reflow
// -----------------------------------------------------
@ -4157,7 +4125,7 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::SizeItemInCrossAxis(
// so we don't bother with making aAxisTracker pick the cross-axis component
// for us.)
nscoord crossAxisBorderPadding = aItem.GetBorderPadding().TopBottom();
if (reflowResult.BSize() < crossAxisBorderPadding) {
if (reflowResult.Height() < crossAxisBorderPadding) {
// Child's requested size isn't large enough for its border/padding!
// This is OK for the trivial nsFrame::Reflow() impl, but other frame
// classes should know better. So, if we get here, the child had better be
@ -4170,7 +4138,7 @@ nsFlexContainerFrame::SizeItemInCrossAxis(
aItem.SetCrossSize(0);
} else {
// (normal case)
aItem.SetCrossSize(reflowResult.BSize() - crossAxisBorderPadding);
aItem.SetCrossSize(reflowResult.Height() - crossAxisBorderPadding);
}
aItem.SetAscent(reflowResult.Ascent());