mirror of
https://repo.dactyloidae.xyz/Dactyloidae/UXP.git
synced 2026-09-10 02:08:38 +09:00
Issue #2466 - Part 1: Reduce nsContentPolicy type usage.
Use CSPDirective instead, since it directly deals with CSP anyway. This cleanup prepares for the following changes.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6d1bf36717
commit
4ea2206c15
10 changed files with 43 additions and 105 deletions
|
|
@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ nsCSPContext::GetAllowsEval(bool* outShouldReportViolation,
|
|||
*outAllowsEval = true;
|
||||
|
||||
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < mPolicies.Length(); i++) {
|
||||
if (!mPolicies[i]->allows(nsIContentPolicy::TYPE_SCRIPT,
|
||||
if (!mPolicies[i]->allows(SCRIPT_SRC_DIRECTIVE,
|
||||
CSP_UNSAFE_EVAL,
|
||||
EmptyString(),
|
||||
false)) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ nsCSPContext::GetAllowsEval(bool* outShouldReportViolation,
|
|||
|
||||
// Helper function to report inline violations
|
||||
void
|
||||
nsCSPContext::reportInlineViolation(nsContentPolicyType aContentType,
|
||||
nsCSPContext::reportInlineViolation(CSPDirective aDirective,
|
||||
const nsAString& aNonce,
|
||||
const nsAString& aContent,
|
||||
const nsAString& aViolatedDirective,
|
||||
|
|
@ -499,12 +499,12 @@ nsCSPContext::reportInlineViolation(nsContentPolicyType aContentType,
|
|||
// let's report the hash error; no need to report the unsafe-inline error
|
||||
// anymore.
|
||||
if (!aNonce.IsEmpty()) {
|
||||
observerSubject = (aContentType == nsIContentPolicy::TYPE_SCRIPT)
|
||||
observerSubject = (aDirective == SCRIPT_SRC_DIRECTIVE)
|
||||
? NS_LITERAL_STRING(SCRIPT_NONCE_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC)
|
||||
: NS_LITERAL_STRING(STYLE_NONCE_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
observerSubject = (aContentType == nsIContentPolicy::TYPE_SCRIPT)
|
||||
observerSubject = (aDirective == SCRIPT_SRC_DIRECTIVE)
|
||||
? NS_LITERAL_STRING(SCRIPT_HASH_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC)
|
||||
: NS_LITERAL_STRING(STYLE_HASH_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ nsCSPContext::reportInlineViolation(nsContentPolicyType aContentType,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
NS_IMETHODIMP
|
||||
nsCSPContext::GetAllowsInline(nsContentPolicyType aContentType,
|
||||
nsCSPContext::GetAllowsInline(CSPDirective aDirective,
|
||||
const nsAString& aNonce,
|
||||
bool aParserCreated,
|
||||
const nsAString& aContent,
|
||||
|
|
@ -565,11 +565,7 @@ nsCSPContext::GetAllowsInline(nsContentPolicyType aContentType,
|
|||
{
|
||||
*outAllowsInline = true;
|
||||
|
||||
MOZ_ASSERT(aContentType == nsContentUtils::InternalContentPolicyTypeToExternal(aContentType),
|
||||
"We should only see external content policy types here.");
|
||||
|
||||
if (aContentType != nsIContentPolicy::TYPE_SCRIPT &&
|
||||
aContentType != nsIContentPolicy::TYPE_STYLESHEET) {
|
||||
if (aDirective != SCRIPT_SRC_DIRECTIVE && aDirective != STYLE_SRC_DIRECTIVE) {
|
||||
MOZ_ASSERT(false, "can only allow inline for script or style");
|
||||
return NS_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -577,8 +573,8 @@ nsCSPContext::GetAllowsInline(nsContentPolicyType aContentType,
|
|||
// always iterate all policies, otherwise we might not send out all reports
|
||||
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < mPolicies.Length(); i++) {
|
||||
bool allowed =
|
||||
mPolicies[i]->allows(aContentType, CSP_UNSAFE_INLINE, EmptyString(), aParserCreated) ||
|
||||
mPolicies[i]->allows(aContentType, CSP_NONCE, aNonce, aParserCreated);
|
||||
mPolicies[i]->allows(aDirective, CSP_UNSAFE_INLINE, EmptyString(), aParserCreated) ||
|
||||
mPolicies[i]->allows(aDirective, CSP_NONCE, aNonce, aParserCreated);
|
||||
|
||||
// If the inlined script or style is allowed by either unsafe-inline or the
|
||||
// nonce, go ahead and shortcut this loop.
|
||||
|
|
@ -589,7 +585,7 @@ nsCSPContext::GetAllowsInline(nsContentPolicyType aContentType,
|
|||
// Check if the csp-hash matches against the hash of the script.
|
||||
// If we don't have any content to check, block the script.
|
||||
if (!aContent.IsEmpty()) {
|
||||
allowed = mPolicies[i]->allows(aContentType, CSP_HASH, aContent, aParserCreated);
|
||||
allowed = mPolicies[i]->allows(aDirective, CSP_HASH, aContent, aParserCreated);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!allowed) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -599,8 +595,8 @@ nsCSPContext::GetAllowsInline(nsContentPolicyType aContentType,
|
|||
*outAllowsInline = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
nsAutoString violatedDirective;
|
||||
mPolicies[i]->getDirectiveStringForContentType(aContentType, violatedDirective);
|
||||
reportInlineViolation(aContentType,
|
||||
mPolicies[i]->getDirectiveStringForContentType(aDirective, violatedDirective);
|
||||
reportInlineViolation(aDirective,
|
||||
aNonce,
|
||||
aContent,
|
||||
violatedDirective,
|
||||
|
|
@ -641,17 +637,17 @@ nsCSPContext::GetAllowsInline(nsContentPolicyType aContentType,
|
|||
* GetAllowsInline() and do not call this macro, hence we can pass 'false'
|
||||
* as the argument _aParserCreated_ to allows().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(violationType, contentPolicyType, nonceOrHash, \
|
||||
#define CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(violationType, directive, nonceOrHash, \
|
||||
keyword, observerTopic) \
|
||||
case nsIContentSecurityPolicy::VIOLATION_TYPE_ ## violationType : \
|
||||
PR_BEGIN_MACRO \
|
||||
if (!mPolicies[p]->allows(nsIContentPolicy::TYPE_ ## contentPolicyType, \
|
||||
keyword, nonceOrHash, false)) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
static_assert(directive##_SRC_DIRECTIVE == SCRIPT_SRC_DIRECTIVE || \
|
||||
directive##_SRC_DIRECTIVE == STYLE_SRC_DIRECTIVE); \
|
||||
if (!mPolicies[p]->allows(directive##_SRC_DIRECTIVE, keyword, nonceOrHash, \
|
||||
false)) { \
|
||||
nsAutoString violatedDirective; \
|
||||
mPolicies[p]->getDirectiveStringForContentType( \
|
||||
nsIContentPolicy::TYPE_ ## contentPolicyType, \
|
||||
violatedDirective); \
|
||||
directive##_SRC_DIRECTIVE, violatedDirective); \
|
||||
this->AsyncReportViolation(selfISupports, nullptr, violatedDirective, p, \
|
||||
NS_LITERAL_STRING(observerTopic), aSourceFile,\
|
||||
aScriptSample, aLineNum, aColumnNum); \
|
||||
|
|
@ -711,19 +707,19 @@ nsCSPContext::LogViolationDetails(uint16_t aViolationType,
|
|||
switch (aViolationType) {
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(EVAL, SCRIPT, NS_LITERAL_STRING(""),
|
||||
CSP_UNSAFE_EVAL, EVAL_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(INLINE_STYLE, STYLESHEET, NS_LITERAL_STRING(""),
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(INLINE_STYLE, STYLE, NS_LITERAL_STRING(""),
|
||||
CSP_UNSAFE_INLINE, INLINE_STYLE_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(INLINE_SCRIPT, SCRIPT, NS_LITERAL_STRING(""),
|
||||
CSP_UNSAFE_INLINE, INLINE_SCRIPT_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(NONCE_SCRIPT, SCRIPT, aNonce,
|
||||
CSP_UNSAFE_INLINE, SCRIPT_NONCE_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(NONCE_STYLE, STYLESHEET, aNonce,
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(NONCE_STYLE, STYLE, aNonce,
|
||||
CSP_UNSAFE_INLINE, STYLE_NONCE_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(HASH_SCRIPT, SCRIPT, aContent,
|
||||
CSP_UNSAFE_INLINE, SCRIPT_HASH_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(HASH_STYLE, STYLESHEET, aContent,
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(HASH_STYLE, STYLE, aContent,
|
||||
CSP_UNSAFE_INLINE, STYLE_HASH_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(REQUIRE_SRI_FOR_STYLE, STYLESHEET, NS_LITERAL_STRING(""),
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(REQUIRE_SRI_FOR_STYLE, STYLE, NS_LITERAL_STRING(""),
|
||||
CSP_REQUIRE_SRI_FOR, REQUIRE_SRI_STYLE_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
CASE_CHECK_AND_REPORT(REQUIRE_SRI_FOR_SCRIPT, SCRIPT, NS_LITERAL_STRING(""),
|
||||
CSP_REQUIRE_SRI_FOR, REQUIRE_SRI_SCRIPT_VIOLATION_OBSERVER_TOPIC);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue