Compare commits
No commits in common. "309cd98ea1a0297fd18c017a8b5bd71853b1d5cc" and "a16c1bcb5bc19a42a14a4796074d240402c9800d" have entirely different histories.
309cd98ea1
...
a16c1bcb5b
2 changed files with 18 additions and 16 deletions
|
|
@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct _MwLLWaylandSublevel {
|
|||
|
||||
MwLL parent;
|
||||
|
||||
struct xdg_surface* xdg_surface;
|
||||
struct xdg_surface* parent_xdg_surface;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct _MwLLWaylandPopup {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1512,6 +1512,12 @@ static void setup_sublevel(MwLL parent, MwLL r, int x, int y) {
|
|||
r->wayland.sublevel = malloc(sizeof(struct _MwLLWaylandSublevel));
|
||||
r->wayland.sublevel->parent = parent;
|
||||
|
||||
if(parent->wayland.type == MWLL_WAYLAND_TOPLEVEL) {
|
||||
r->wayland.sublevel->parent_xdg_surface = parent->wayland.toplevel->xdg_surface;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
r->wayland.sublevel->parent_xdg_surface = parent->wayland.sublevel->parent_xdg_surface;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r->wayland.type = MWLL_WAYLAND_SUBLEVEL;
|
||||
|
||||
r->wayland.display = parent->wayland.display;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1530,10 +1536,6 @@ static void setup_sublevel(MwLL parent, MwLL r, int x, int y) {
|
|||
|
||||
r->wayland.framebuffer.surface = wl_compositor_create_surface(compositor);
|
||||
|
||||
if(WAYLAND_GET_INTERFACE(r->wayland, xdg_wm_base))
|
||||
r->wayland.sublevel->xdg_surface =
|
||||
xdg_wm_base_get_xdg_surface(WAYLAND_GET_INTERFACE(r->wayland, xdg_wm_base)->context, r->wayland.framebuffer.surface);
|
||||
|
||||
r->wayland.sublevel->subsurface = wl_subcompositor_get_subsurface(r->wayland.sublevel->subcompositor, r->wayland.framebuffer.surface, parent_surface);
|
||||
|
||||
wl_subsurface_set_desync(r->wayland.sublevel->subsurface);
|
||||
|
|
@ -2307,14 +2309,15 @@ static void MwLLDetachImpl(MwLL handle, MwPoint* point) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void MwLLShowImpl(MwLL handle, int show) {
|
||||
/* Some guy on a mailing list said that "abusing" wl_surface_attach for this purpose is bad? This is documented behavior so please I beg of you let me know if there's a compositor that actually has a problem with this. */
|
||||
if(handle->wayland.framebuffer.surface) {
|
||||
wl_surface_attach(handle->wayland.framebuffer.surface, show ? handle->wayland.framebuffer.shm_buffer : NULL, 0, 0);
|
||||
wl_surface_commit(handle->wayland.framebuffer.surface);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(handle->wayland.backbuffer.surface) {
|
||||
wl_surface_attach(handle->wayland.backbuffer.surface, show ? handle->wayland.backbuffer.shm_buffer : NULL, 0, 0);
|
||||
wl_surface_commit(handle->wayland.backbuffer.surface);
|
||||
(void)show;
|
||||
switch(handle->wayland.type) {
|
||||
case MWLL_WAYLAND_UNKNOWN:
|
||||
case MWLL_WAYLAND_TOPLEVEL:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case MWLL_WAYLAND_SUBLEVEL:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case MWLL_WAYLAND_POPUP:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -2439,9 +2442,8 @@ static void MwLLEndStateChangeImpl(MwLL handle) {
|
|||
int i;
|
||||
for(i = 0; i < arrlen(w->children); i++) {
|
||||
if(w->children[i]->lowlevel->wayland.type == MWLL_WAYLAND_SUBLEVEL) {
|
||||
MwLL child = w->children[i]->lowlevel;
|
||||
child->wayland.sublevel->xdg_surface =
|
||||
xdg_wm_base_get_xdg_surface(WAYLAND_GET_INTERFACE(handle->wayland, xdg_wm_base)->context, handle->wayland.framebuffer.surface);
|
||||
MwLL child = w->children[i]->lowlevel;
|
||||
child->wayland.sublevel->parent_xdg_surface = handle->wayland.popup->xdg_surface;
|
||||
wl_subsurface_destroy(child->wayland.sublevel->subsurface);
|
||||
wl_flush(handle);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue